Footnote references should be placed outside punctuation, but inside the closing parenthesis when referring to matter within parentheses. It makes no distinction between numeric or symbol footnotes. Travel planning software for mac mac. When using superscripts to indicate a footnote, do these fall inside or outside adjacent punctuation? If there is an answer, is that answer applicable worldwide, or just to specific regions or publishers? Does it matter what the particular punctuation is, including such punctuation as commas, colons, parentheses and other brackets, periods, and quotation marks? Does it matter whether the footnote applies to just one gloss 1, or to an entire phrase in toto? Does the answer change if, instead of using instead of numeric footnotes, you use the traditional sequence of symbols (*, †, ‡, §, ‖, and ¶) 2? • OED: “A word inserted between the lines or in the margin as an explanatory equivalent of a foreign or otherwise difficult word in the text; hence applied to a simliar explanatory rendering of a word given in a glossary or dictionary.” • As enumerated on pp 68–69 of Robert Bringhurst’s The Elements of Typographic Style (version 3.2); Hartley and Marks, 2008. ![]() Bringhurst goes on to say “But beyond the asterisk, dagger 3, and double dagger 4, this order is not familiar to most readers, and never was.” • That is, the † character at codepoint U+2020 DAGGER, also known as the obelisk, obelus, or long cross. The classical plural of obelus is obeli. • That is, the ‡ character at codepoint U+2021 DOUBLE DAGGER, also known as the diesis or double obelisk. The classical plural of diesis is dieses. @Mitch: I have only the above comment. But seriously, common sense dictates that you use as few notes as possible: a note is a necessary evil. Word for mac won't print page range in word. ![]() They are an evil because switching between main text and notes is very annoying, easy to lose track of where you were. You only use them when you have to. If you are already in a note, then why not just write out whatever details you wish to add within the note itself, instead of referring to yet another note? There is no reason at all to do so, and it makes your text even less readable. Unless you are trying to make your text look fancier than it is. – Dec 22 '12 at 23:25 •. I thought readers might like to see how different style guides address the general question of how to position footnote callouts (termed 'cues' in The Oxford Guide to Style, 'note numbers' in The Chicago Manual of Style, and 'references' in Words into Type). Here is a quick rundown of the relevant passages from one British and five U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |